As we have seen in classes, the novel V for Vendetta set a
clash between two adverse ideologies, fascism and anarchy, in a time in which
it was difficult to explicitly express it. Thus, the graphic novel was a paraliterary
resource that the author, Alan Moore, used for conveying his anarchist ideas
and reactions to what he was living, since comics or graphic novels “are the perfect medium for political
stories, because they can get away with more” (Hoppenstand, 2006 in Call,
2008)
Plot and Context of
production
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99d68/99d6850867c9ee96fcac3ddfaa47dbb4efde704d" alt=""
The land of
Do-as-you-please
Furthermore, in the novel anarchy
appears as V’s mistress after he left Madam Justice which represents a
libertarian issue and Moore’s critique of the political matters during Cold War
since he wasn’t fond of neither Soviet communism nor Anglo-American capitalism,
hence, his only option left is anarchy. Moreover, that anarchy has two
different views in the novel, the one of Evey, which is the most common one,
and the one of V. Evey’s view of anarchy is one in which everybody do what they
want to, everything is disordered and chaotic, the land of do-as you-please, however, V’s view represents the
Moore’s idea of anarchy, as expressed in the following extract of the novel
E: 'All this riot and
uproar, V ... is this anarchy?'
'Is this the land of do-as-you-please?'
'Is this the land of do-as-you-please?'
V: No.
This is only the land of take-what-you-want. Anarchy means "without
leaders", not "without order". With anarchy comes an age or
ordnung, of true order, which is to say voluntary order... this age of ordung
will begin when the mad and incoherent cycle of verwirrung that these bulletins
reveal has run its course...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a91fd/a91fd47919892a62d4074b7dd47b3db0dfa57574" alt=""
Therefore, as communism and capitalism are ruled out, the
option left for V and, obviously, for the author is anarchy as he believe that
"Anarchy is
and always has been a romance. It’s clearly the best way and the only morally
sensible way to run the world - that everybody should be the master of their
own destiny. Everybody should be their own leader. This is something that I
still believe I think
that even a cursory look around the world at the moment – particularly at the
moment – would reveal that it is about .000001 percent of the world’s
population that causes 99.99999 percent of the world’s problems. And that tiny
percentage – it’s not the Jewish banking conspiracy, it’s not the
asylum-seekers, it’s not the secret homosexual conspiracy running Hollywood,
it’s not even the Scientologists: it is leaders. That what we need is an
administration at most; we don’t need people to boss us about"(Moore, 2008)
All in all, I believe that this
perception was what Moore wanted to express through V, due to the fact that more
than a man or woman (we never know), V is an idea and that is what makes
him/her dangerous (Call, 2008), V cannot die because he’s an idea. But,
what do you think? Do you agree with Moore’s idea of anarchy?
References
Call, L. (2008). A is for Anarchy, V is for Vendetta. Retrieved November 21, 2014, from Digital Commons Cal Poly: http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=hist_fac
Loy, T. (2008, April 17). Anarchy in Critical Dystopias:An Anatomy of Rebellion. Retrieved November 21, 2014, from Digital Library and Archives, Virginia Tech: http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-04272008-112840/unrestricted/Loy_MA_ThesisETD.pdf
Moore, A. (2008). Alan Moore on Anarchism.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKfF-nxjDi0
Moore, A. & Lloyd, D. (1988) V for Vendetta. New York: DC Comics, Inc. .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKfF-nxjDi0
Moore, A. & Lloyd, D. (1988) V for Vendetta. New York: DC Comics, Inc. .
Muise, C. (2010). Major Themes and symbols in V for Vendetta by Alan Moore. Retrieved November 21, 2014, from Hyperink: www.hyperink.com/Major-Themes-And-Symbols-Innbspldquov-For-Vendettardquo-By-Alan-Moore-b260a9
If I have undestood correctly, Moore's vision of anarchy is that we should have administrations that should lead us, but not a leader in itself. If that is the case, I strongly disagree with Mr. Moore. I believe his idea of anarchy is utopical, expecting that a group of people who may serve as an administration to lead, in this case, a country or a society would turn out to be the same as having one single leader, the only difference that the leader would be in disguise. It is a widespread belief that there is always a naturally driven leader in every group of people, so if we think that in this so-called administration is not going to be one person who has the quality of sutlety imposing his/her ideas over the others, therefore it would not be much difference from having a "visible" leader rather than one hidden in the shadow of ruling administration.
ResponderEliminar