1984 as one of the most faithful reflections of our
society
In 1984
Orwell depicts a dystopian world ruled by political power where citizens only
have to respect one rule ‘’obey to what the political party says’’. There is no
freedom at all, and citizens live like prisoners being heavily oppressed
without even realize.
One the biggest accomplishments of 1984 is that carries deep social consciousness to the readers, and
at the same time the audience is able to recognize their own world in the novel.
More interestingly, people have to bear in mind that 1984 was written in 1947-1948
which makes us reflect on the fact that Orwell wasn’t too far from the
truth.
With all that being said, if we do the analysis
between the novel and our lives, we will find that we are also being controlled
by corporations, religion, rules, and political forces. There’s a lot of bureaucratic
and technological control. For example,
we are constantly under surveillance, the CIA have all our information. Whenever
we search on google, or whenever we install Microsoft in our computers, buy a
phone, send an email, make a call phone we are being investigated. What’s more,
we have been induced to believe that sharing our life trough social media is
fun and great, but at the same tine we are giving free access to all our
information, likes, dislikes. We are
facilitating the process for them. This
idea of being constantly under surveillance resembles the idea of Foucault of panopticon
societies.
Foucault argues that since the early 19th
century two different concepts of structuring power merged, creating a control
device that he compares to the Panopticon, an architectural concept developed
by Bentham in the late 18th century. According to Foucault the Panopticon
serves as a metaphor for “defining power relations in terms of the everyday
life of men.” Foucault’s concept of the Panopticon as a way of describing power
relations offers interesting possibilities for analyses of cultural landscapes.
He points out that hospitals, prisons, or schools are organized along the
Panopticon structure. So, we are law-abiding citizens because we are under
surveillance all the time. We are being tracked by internet, spied by cameras,
being watched trough the eye of authority. We are disciplined not because we
are naturally good, but because we are told by religion, society that you have
to follow certain patters, rules in order to fit. One may argue that people do
not stole and lie not necessarily because they are naturally good, but because
they are afraid of going to the ‘’hell’’.
Therefore,
in fear of being punished we behave like role models and good citizens. That’s
is also one principle present in 1894. Most people live in fear and act
according to what the power ask you them to do.
Foucault asserts that ‘’By individualizing the
subjects and placing them in a state of constant visibility, the efficiency of
the institution is maximized. Furthermore, it guarantees the function of power,
even when there is no one actually asserting it. It is in this respect that the
Panopticon functions automatically’’.
The use of technology, social media is the best
example to prove that the panopticon really works by its own, almost
automatically.
Do you consider yourself a free citizen? Maybe you
should consider the idea that maybe you are being induced to believe that you
are free when you are not.
References
Foucault, Michel. "Discipline and
punishment." New York: Pantheon (1977).
Orwell, George. 1984. Editions Underbahn Ltd.,
2006.
Albeit nowadays it's in vogue that freedom is a human right and politicians fancy themselves ardent advocates of that cause, we're all oppressed and ''chained''. At the wake of the brand new technological advancements, new ways of controlling and patrolling citizens have cropped up in our lives. At first glance, social media looks inoffensive, but if we look and analyze it in depth we can unveil the logic and ideology behind it. As you said before, tech-savvy people and politicians have been very cunning when it comes to make us believe that social media is the oh-so-perfect way to get in touch with people uploading photos and so on and so forth. But what we do when we do so is to beam out a lot of sensitive info, and the ''ruling'' class can collect it and sort of have a personal portfolio of us WHICH IS UTTERLY BIZARRE!!! we are made to believe that we are free, but we are not free whatsoever. The system itself has a bazillion ways of tracking us!!! is that freedom?? I think that Orwell was a man ahead of time, he could foresee and envision the society we are having now.
ResponderEliminar