When I was reading 1984 it came to my
mind the similarities between other dystopian societies (The Hunger
Games, Divergent, The Maze Runner and so on). I know our teacher
mentioned that The Hunger Games is similar to the dystopian novel
1984, but I do not want to raise a controversy among one of my
favorite books, so I would like to compare it to another dystopian
book, that I really like by the way, that is The Giver by Lois Lowry.
I think they share a lot of similarities such as the concepts of
sameness, loss of identity, a totalitarian regime, and so on.
Moreover, there is controversy since some people believe that The
Giver is a copy of 1984 (and also they are against of the idea that
teenagers read The Giver in middle school).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35e9f/35e9ff9f2f7731b0badb7a4eac814c53e8aa8a16" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5f82/a5f8252af112261fedff0c31800b0194a5f201f5" alt=""
Now, I would like to establish some
points of comparison between this two dystopian novels. First of all,
the governments share similar ideas; both control societies, both
governments decide what society can or cannot do (in The Giver is a
little bit more extreme because with injections they also control the
colors they can perceive). On the other hand, in 1984, Big Brother controls Oceania with different Ministries, such as: The Ministry
of Truth which is the one involved with the control of the media,
entertainment, propaganda, education etc. This is the one in charge
of keeping the illusion of the absolute power of the Party and Big Brother. I also would like to mention the Ministry
of Love (the one which enforces loyalty to the leadership through
fear), the Ministry of Plenty (in charge of the economy; supplies,
rations of food, etc.) and the Ministry of Peace (in charge of the
army which lives around the principle of perpetual war). To keep
this absolute regime in Oceania, they live by the following slogan:
concept that it was so extreme that they were punished even with their own thoughts: "Thoughtcrime does not entail death, thoughtcrime IS death"
Moreover, both novels try to keep
the concept of community or “sameness”. For example, in The Giver,
Jonas says "our people made that choice, the choice to go to
Sameness. Before my time, before the previous time, back and back and
back. We relinquished color when we relinquished sunshine and did
away with difference. We gained control of many things. But we had to
let go of others"(95). On the other hand, in 1984, Oceania is
controlled by Big Brother who does not allow people to decide by
themselves, for example Winston says: “Freedom is the freedom to say that
two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51852/518522394a53c5fe5672964cace99e12e3a9da29" alt=""
As a conclusion, these distopian heroes react against the system. They seem to have a social consciousness where probably nobody else has it. They live in a panoptical society where they are constantly being observed. However they are able to fight against that. In other words, we have to remember who the real enemy is.
References
References
"1984" in
Comparison to "The Giver". (2007, August 27). In
WriteWork.com. Retrieved 17:43, November 19, 2014, from
http://www.writework.com/essay/1984-comparison-giver
Lowry,
Lois. The Giver. New York: Delacorte, 1993.
Orwell,
George. 1984. New York: Signet Classics, 1977.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario