martes, 4 de noviembre de 2014

Presence of feminism on Jane Austen's Pride and prejudice


Pride and Prejudice seems to be titled in that particular way as a representation of the two main characters, Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth Bennet respectively. One night at the Meryton ball, Mr Darcy coming from the upper-middle class labels Elizabeth as ‘tolerable, but not enough to tempt him’ depicting his pride, while Lizzy, who comes from a family with very little wealth, refers to Mr. Darcy as the proudest and most disagreeable man in the world, because he had rejected dancing with anyone who does not belong to his own party.

The main problems Mr Darcy and Lizzy encounter in the novel are the result of the way England was stratified at Jane Austen’s time. For example, class-consciousness was so strong that family connections and fortune were believed to determine social mobility. Also, there was the idea that a woman needed to be accomplished (having knowledge of music, singing, drawing, dancing, the modern languages, manners of walking, etc.) in order to get a decent marriage almost as the goal of her entire life; in fact, it was a lifetime opportunity for them.

Austen’s awareness of gender equality issues is clearly reflected in her work. What’s more, her novel has often been cited by scholars as having a feminist perspective (Monteiro, 2008: 109) a term that has been assigned to her work from a more modern perspective on the topic. Which character reflects then that perspective? From my point of view, Mr. Darcy is the most feminist character in the novel.

As feminism is a slippery term, for the purpose of this entry we will consider feminism as the belief that men and women should have equals rights and opportunities. In theory, it is the political, economic and social equality of the sexes. Having said that, let’s go back to a conversation between Caroline (Bingley’s sister) and Mr. Darcy about accomplished women.

A woman must have a thorough knowledge of music, singing, drawing, dancing, and the modern languages, to deserve the word; and besides all this, she must possess a certain something in her air and manner of walking, the tone of her voice, her address and expressions, or the word will be but half deserved." "All this she must possess," added Darcy, "and to all this she must yet add something more substantial, in the improvement of her mind by extensive reading."


  
 Mr. Darcy’s perspective on women being accomplished is not based on the idea that women must elevate themselves to the height of men, but to transform themselves into a men’s equal. In this sense, it is essential that women become a true and complete version of who they really want to be and not what the society expects them to be. From a more modern perspective, unfortunately, some women are still expected to be: objects of desire, mothers, wives, housekeepers, but not professionals.

All in all, Jane Austen, who was living in a male-ruled world, realized that women could also make their own decisions (just like when Lizzy rejects 2 proposals of marriage (Mr. Collins and Mr. Darcy’s), that it was a right to all of us to be equal (as in the last conversation between Lizzy and Lady Catherine the Bough), that women must also have access not only to governess, but to receive higher education as men did, that women should question marriage and so on.

Despite the fact that Lizzy’s sister, Lidia has damaged her family’s prestige and that the Bennet’s family possesses little fortune, she is with no doubt Mr. Darcy’s equal in terms of value (good of a person) and intricacy. Besides, as Mr. Darcy appreciates Elizabeth true worth, we could say that he is considered the hero in the novel.

I was wondering… Do you think men like Darcy really exist in our country? Why? Why not?

Sources:


Emma Watson HeForShe Speech at the United Nations | UN Women 2014
Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice

Marshall, C. (1992) "Dull Elves" and Feminists: A Summary of Feminist Criticism of Jane Austen


Monteiro, B. (2008).  The pleasures of comic mischief in Jane Austen’s novels. (Doctoral dissertation). Boston University, United States of America.

2 comentarios:

  1. To answer your question a bit, I believe that more than asking ourselves if that kind of men exist in our country, we should be questioning ourselves if this mentality or vision of equality is present in our society at all. Please don't get me wrong. If a single person does believe in this vision, that's ok, but to me it should be more relevant to find out if we -as a society- are fully aware of it. Or even better: Are we educating ourselves under this recognition of equality in rights?
    As far as I'm concerned, we are still living in a phallocentric society, in which women are valued differently from men even in ridiculous things such as salary.
    Do you tally with me on this point? I'm sure that we will find at least one man in our country who does believe on this vision of women, but as I say, I'd rather seeing society doing something about it.

    ResponderEliminar
  2. I tally with you ideas because for me Mr. Darcy is shown as someone who rejects traditions. The tradition was that women were inferior to men. Women needed to be married at certain age in order to not to be rejected by society. How chauvinist is that? Darcy is against this. When he meets Lizzy, he says that she is nothing special. I believe that he said that because he did not know Lizzy yet. For him, Lizzy was just like other women searching for a husband, until they know each other. Jane Austen empowers women by giving them the opportunity to choose. Lizzy rejected Darcy, but he instead of forgetting her, fought for her. Darcy’s choice puts Lizzy and him at the same level. They are equals because both have the right to choose.
    I do believe that men like Darcy, who view women as equals, exist in the country, however, still exist a small group that still believe that men are superior. Women are now seen as equal because through history, art, music, sports, etc, they have proved that they are not inferior to men as it was believe centuries ago. We are all equals.

    ResponderEliminar