behaviours establishing the dos and don’ts
even in their private life. The protagonist, Winston Smith, starts writing a
diary which lets the reader comprehend the harsh oppression people are
suffering at the hands of the leader of the government (a.k.a. the Big Brother)
and the Thought Police. Once he meets
Julia a co-worker and O’Brien (who is supposedly against the Big Brother).
Winston’s rebelliousness transforms him in a victim that is tortured in Room
101.
From my point
of view, both the Pit and the Pendulum and 1984 are related as they have some
elements of dystopian societies, such as, the dystopia control imposed by
regimes of fear and dystopian protagonists who usually feel trapped and
struggle to escape.
First, the dystopian control
presented in the Pit and the Pendulum corresponds to a religious
and moral control established by the Inquisition. Although this control
is not explicitly mentioned in the tale, we could understand (based on
historical records as the documentary in the references) that the sins,
committed against God, were a terrible offence to the Inquisition’s members.
They thought that PAIN was the only way to make these people come back to God. Although
we do not know exactly what the narrator did, we can deduce he is being torture
to make him confess his sins.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65d3c/65d3c5e6d55ffa56c031c5be342e8b814647331b" alt=""
Secondly, the protagonist of the Pit and the
Pendulum is clearly a dystopian one, because he is
trapped and immobilized. After having fallen asleep, the narrator
wakes up and is trapped in a wooden bed. To everyone’s astonishment over the
protagonist there was a pendulum, which descended towards him; and round him,
there were a lot of huge ravenous rats. It did not matter if the narrator
decided to jump into the pit or get sliced in half by the pendulum; he seemed
not to be able to shun his fate: death.
In the case of 1984, the dystopian control
presented is related to a technological, totalitarian,
as well as, a moral control. “The Big Brother” aims to exercises total
power over people’s minds and behaviour. People are not only being watched the whole
time, but also they are being restricted to have friends, to be in love, to
have sex, to dates and so on. Another example of this could be the following: “In
the end, the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would
have to believe it. It was inevitable” (Orwell 66)
If someone challenged the hard and fast rules established
by the Big Brother, the thought police will arrest that person to send him/her
a labour camp or to be tortured in a worst scenario, which can definitely be
considered as a regime of fear. The scariest
place was Room 101 (a torture chamber where every person’s deepest fear is faced).
It caused people such irrational fear that some people reacted as the
following:
“'Do anything to me!' he yelled. ’You've been starving me for weeks. Finish it off and let me die. Shoot me. Hang me. Sentence me to twenty-five years. Is there somebody else you want me to give away? Just say who it is and I'll tell you anything you want. I don't care who it is or what you do to
them. I've got a wife and three children. The biggest of them isn't six years old. You can take the whole lot of them and cut their throats in front of my eyes, and I'll stand by and watch it. But not Room 101!'” (Orwell 193)
In the case of Winston, he could also be considered as a dystopian protagonist,because once inside Room 101, he was trapped waiting for some ravenous rats to be released to gnaw off his face, he has already questioned the existing social system and also he has helped us realized some negative aspects of the society at that time.
Room 101 scene in 1894 (movie): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3U83QLoATU&hd=1
Well, if you are wondering
what happened with the narrator in the Pit and the Pendulum, I encourage you to
read it! (You can find the link in the references)
Finally, I would like to
know if you tally with my ideas or not and if do you think that by and large, governments care about people’s life or just
see them as “elements” that are needed for the system to work?
References
"Inquisition" Berean Beacon. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbBBezxalXU&hd=1
Orwell, George. 1984. Ed. Erich Fromm. New York: Harcourt, 1949.
"The Pit and the Pendulum" Edgar Allen Poe. (1996, November 14).In ibiblio.org. Retrieved 17:10, November 20, 2014, from: http://www.ibiblio.org/ebooks/Poe/Pit_Pendulum.pdf
"Inquisition" Berean Beacon. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbBBezxalXU&hd=1
Orwell, George. 1984. Ed. Erich Fromm. New York: Harcourt, 1949.
"The Pit and the Pendulum" Edgar Allen Poe. (1996, November 14).In ibiblio.org. Retrieved 17:10, November 20, 2014, from: http://www.ibiblio.org/ebooks/Poe/Pit_Pendulum.pdf
I found your entry very interesting as you established a very clear relationshionship between 1984 and the pit and the pendulum. I believe that both books represent a dystopian control over cityzens.On the one hand,in 1984 the bigbrother control people by censoring the media and shaping cityzens´thoughts by knowing all what they do and think.Evenmore, the Bigbrother knows even your worst fear and does not doubt of using this knowledge against you.
ResponderEliminarOn the other hand, The pit and the pendulum is a representation is another kinf of power abuse, but in this case they control people behaviour throgh a religious and moral regimen that was established by the Inquisition.As in 1984, the Inquisition also tortured people who dear to criticize or behave in a different way.
Well, in both situations I believe that the government does not care about people lives, they only sees us as numbers which they can use in order to amass more power and to achieve their goal using us as experiments of their regimen.s
That is one connection I did not see coming. Very interesting indeed. It caught my attention the fact that even Poe was concerned of such a topic. Sometimes we find references to society's realities in places that we never imagined.
ResponderEliminarTrying to answer your question a bit, I believe that the concept of 'people' has changed dramatically. Ever since we became part of a system that produced money for some, we became pieces in a gigantic device called society. For our authorities, that is what we are, expendables parts of this mechanized system. Therefore, we, as human beings, represent no value for the society if we do not help to produce resources as everyone does. The only thing that will give meaning to our lives appears to be the job in which we will work. But maybe this is just a horrible vision of things...