In order to
analyse this issue, we have to go back to the early 19th century:
political and social unrest, the Industrial Revolution, and a rising, but still
segregated Victorian middle-class.
The society
exposed in Austen’s novel bases its interaction on the distinction of social
classes and the patterns of behaviour followed by everyone back in those times.
In 2013, Chin-Yi describes this social world as “highly stratified and laden
with class struggle and pretension”.
![]() |
We read
throughout the novel that this class distinction is something accepted by
almost everyone, with not many people refusing to behave differently in front
of someone who belongs to a superior social class. What is more, Austen creates
characters like Mr. Collins who shows extreme devotion to his patron from a superior
class. And at the same time, she, Lady Catherine de Bourgh, knows there are “inferior
people” and makes it noticeable.
Most of the
characters of “Pride and Prejudice” feel
this distinction of class is the base for a well-organised society, and it is
clear to us, the readers, that they feel that is how things work.
We can take
as an example the early relationship between Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth: he, a wealthy
upper-class gentleman, who looks down at everyone due to his superiority; she, the
second of five daughters of a middle-class family. When they first met, Mr.
Darcy felt she was not enough for him since she was not beautiful enough,
smiled too much, and the most important point, she did not come from a rich or
decent family.
This was
definitely not taken as discrimination, but it was something common in those
times, due to the fact that everything, especially relationships, was based on
the distinction of social classes.
Nonetheless,
this assumption of the British society distinction is broken by Elizabeth and
Mr. Darcy: even though they come from different social classes, Elizabeth feels
she is not less intelligent and worthy than he is just for the fact that she
comes from an inferior social class. At the same time Mr. Darcy’s pride disappears,
in a way breaking the rules and getting them together.
From my
personal point of view, through Pride and
prejudice Austen wanted to show this division of people according to their
social class, among other factors. However, at the same time she shows how this
common assumption of different classes is broken by this couple, and how in a
way love breaks with these barriers.
References:
-Lambert,
T. (2012). A history of Britain in the 19th century. Local History. Retrived from http://www.localhistories.org/19thcentengland.html
-Loftus, D.
(2011). The rise of the Victorian middle class. British history. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/victorians/middle_classes_01.shtml
-19th
Century England Social Hierarchy (2014). Retrieved from http://www.hierarchystructure.com/19th-century-england-social-hierarchy/
-Chin-Yi,
C. (2013). Gender and Class Oppression in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. The Indian review of World Literature in
English, 9 (II)
I totally coincide with what you have stated. I believe that Jane Austen on purpose present the concept of "classes" in her novel in order to show that in that time, class and reputation did play a fundamental role in people's lives. Austen exposes a clear representation of the stricly regimented nature of life for the middle and upper classes in Regency England. For instance the Bennet family does socialize with he upper-class Bingleys and Darcys, however, they are clearly their social inferiors and are treated as such.
ResponderEliminar